Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions

[Andre van Tonder <andre@x>]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Cowan wrote:

> Jonathan Kraut scripsit:
>
>> I hope WG1 will reconsider lifting the restriction that "any
>> internal syntax definitions in a body must come before any internal
>> definitions."
>
> Ticket filed.  Another possible resolution is to clarify that this
> restriction only applies *before* macroexpansion is done.

How do you decide if a form is a definition or syntax definition before 
macroexpanding it?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports