[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6

Vitaly Magerya writes:

[snip much]

> Finally, in many places where a function is described the report
> first says "it is an error if [...]" and only then describes what
> the function does. Can we reverse this order?

Seconded. From what I remember in the draft that I last read - which
is not the current draft - some of the "it is an error if" statements
could be removed, since the type of the argument is already specified
unobtrusively by the argument name in the entry head.

Scheme-reports mailing list