[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
- From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:30:41 -0800
- In-reply-to: <mailman.642.1329766411.878.scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org>
- References: <mailman.642.1329766411.878.scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org>
Another NaN case that I've seen handled in various ways:
> (equal? +nan.0 +nan.0)
#f
> (let ((x +nan.0)) (equal? x x))
#t
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports