Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Is the following a correct translation of this guard clause:

Unfortunately, `guard` is the thing I understand least about R7RS.
I recommend some testing with an R6RS system, or at least one that
implements SRFI 35.  Alternatively, the r6rs-discuss list probably has
useful information.

-- 
Don't be so humble.  You're not that great.             John Cowan
        --Golda Meir                                    cowan@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports