[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym
> On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
>> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the compiler
>> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It may even
>> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation.
>> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause problems
>> for such a compiler.
> Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't
> cope with this?
Chicken's inline egg would not support this. That's intended
for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL
Scheme-reports mailing list