Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Andy Wingo scripsit:

> FWIW R6RS chose option 2, in a discussion in which you participated.
> Regarding vector-map:
>
>   http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2007-June/002775.html

I didn't participate in that particular subthread.  Can you point to the
discussion of option 2 for MAP?

> (Not that long ago, right?)

I too reserve the right to change my mind.

> I can quote too :)  "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little
> minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines."

Or more briefly:  "Emerson!"  Not to be confused with "Schenectady!"
(As in "Where do you get your crazy ideas?")

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          cowan@x
Please leave your values                Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.                      check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel                   --Cordelia Vorkosigan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports