[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
Peter Bex scripsit:
> This looks interesting, but will require some more experimentation
> before being generally acceptable, I think. I'm wary of things like
> this, as it seems a lot like the unholy idea that all DSSSL-style
> keywords must be bound.
Apropos that, you might want to look at KeywordArgumentsArcfide, which
requires keywords (not DSSSL keywords, but colon-ized keywords) to be
bound. The nice feature is that it's pure R5RS + records.
They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan
with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
wound. If they had succeeded, you would
become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord. --Gandalf
Scheme-reports mailing list