In the matter of the definition of `eqv?` on inexact numbers, I
have voted for `r6rs` (operational equivalence), `representational`
(representational, i.e., bitwise equivalence), and `r5rs` (numerical
equality as in `=`) in that order. Note that `eqv?` will remain
unspecified on two NaNs no matter how this vote comes out.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports