Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo

["Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>]

That may well be, but we shouldn't change Scheme because Bigloo doesn't implement something correctly.  That it gets case/eqv? wrong is hardly important, since it gets tail calls wrong too. It's Not Scheme.

Thomas

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x> wrote:

Bigloo is, nevertheless an important implementation of a very
Scheme-like (mostly R5RS compliant) language that has an
interpreter, bytecode compiler, C/native, JVM, .NET and _javascript_
compilers with FFI support and portable library system.

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Bigloo isn't even trying to be an implementation of Scheme.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports