Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax

[Eli Barzilay <eli@x>]

Just now, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 
> +1, except that it's even simpler than that -- there are some common
> names that are often used in multiple places as is (for example, `+'
> or `if'), no need for escapes.

(Forgot a smiley here -- obviously you'd have to be insane to have a
library define `+' and `if'.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports