Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Yes, if you provide implementation support for it,
> see http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/shared.html

I'll have a look.

> Also for lazy data structures see
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Tying_the_Knot,
> for which I have a Scheme version lying around somewhere.

We're going to have SRFI 42 streams.

> Personally I am fond of first, second, etc.; I think they are more readable
> > than car, cadr, etc.
> >
> 
> At least remove the (scheme cxr) equivalents.

Okay, both go in.

> We should just remove the lset equivalents - that's what SRFI 113 is for.

Already done.

> What about iqq (quasiquote) in addition to iq?

Good in principle, but painful.

> iphone seems to be missing.

*snort*

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@x
                Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
                Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports