[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/30/2011 02:07 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym
> <alaric@x> wrote:
>> On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
>>> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the compiler
>>> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It may even
>>> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation.
>>> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause problems
>>> for such a compiler.
>> Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't
>> cope with this?
> Chicken's inline egg would not support this. That's intended
> for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL
I'll discount that one, then, as it merely "could be" :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Scheme-reports mailing list