[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Andre van Tonder scripsit:
>> It definitely will, probably either Taylor Campbell's or Olin Shivers's.
>> No :-) at all.
Because WG2 so voted. All of you had ample opportunity to join it,
but for whatever reason you couldn't or didn't, so you don't get a
vote at this point.
(If anyone wants to join now, let me know. We could use warm blood.)
> have not even gone through the SRFI process. This is too close to
> The big problem that many of us had with R6RS were the pieces where
> certain editors forced their own favorite "cool" but experimental ideas
> into the standard.
Where they became mandatory. This stuff is *not mandatory*.
Even the best of friends cannot John Cowan
attend each others' funeral. cowan@x
--Kehlog Albran, The Profit http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Scheme-reports mailing list