[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
- To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
- From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:38:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTik2QF-u=58SLtQDTTWnx6htQxhqXA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <BANLkTi=hSfKrHo13BUMP==SNPCX-+As0HQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kSqWZpF-fAPObreiuAf9FxPb85w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik2QF-u=58SLtQDTTWnx6htQxhqXA@mail.gmail.com>
On p 19 internal syntax definitions are required to precede internal
definitions.
This make it impossible to do, e.g., the following:
(let ()
(define-record-type A ....)
(define-record-type B ....)
....)
if define-record-type expands into both syntax and variable definitions as in
SRFI 9.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports