[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Then why can you say that a REPL "should" support redefinition?
> (Without defining what redefinition means.)
> This refers to redefining variables and syntax in general.
> For the specific case of redefining record types we could
> add a note that existing instances may or may not be
> mapped to the new type according to some unspecified
> semantics, but I'm not sure if such a note adds anything.
Just figured out that neither include nor load can be used to
define/redefine libraries. So libraries are immutable and there is no
portable way to "add" new libraries, right?
Scheme-reports mailing list