[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures

This Formal Comment was substantially adopted by a vote of the WG.
However, the suggestions to reorder the arguments of the destructive
`*-copy!` procedures and to to rename various procedures were not

John Cowan  cowan@x  http://ccil.org/~cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves.
        --Murray Gell-Mann

Scheme-reports mailing list