[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:08:42 -0500
This Formal Comment was substantially adopted by a vote of the WG.
However, the suggestions to reorder the arguments of the destructive
`*-copy!` procedures and to to rename various procedures were not
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves.
Scheme-reports mailing list