[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit:
> I'm now wondering who actually voted FOR this (but not wondering so
> hard as to go digging through everyone's ballots to find out :-)
Always ready to serve.
Cowan, Gleckler, Lucier, Rush, Shinn had R5RS as their top or only
choice. Ganz preferred to always return zero values. Hsu, Medernach,
Snell-Pym had R6RS as their top or only choice. Other WG members did
not vote on this issue.
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
You cannot enter here. Go back to the abyss prepared for you! Go back!
Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master. Go! --Gandalf
Scheme-reports mailing list