[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching

To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:22:43 -0500
Cc: discuss-r6rs@x, scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinuq6khMFE1FBcdxUCmi3fcQJaq+22zymjF_SOs@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1292969081.2277.54.camel@io> <20101221225457.GG25830@mercury.ccil.org> <1292188488.3696.27.camel@io> <19730.1898.352834.459459@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> <20101222165533.GA19901@mercury.ccil.org> <AANLkTikR0uFyhe12OdU=FAz1cd8sstMDNVHjhyGB6sVn@mail.gmail.com> <1293050092.2356.33.camel@io> <AANLkTindWovo+EMo_kVL3MSkur3kv4V5tm7CO7djJEJk@mail.gmail.com> <1293054424.2356.58.camel@io> <AANLkTinuq6khMFE1FBcdxUCmi3fcQJaq+22zymjF_SOs@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Bushnell, BSG scripsit:

> I have no objection to a form like CASE* where
> 
> (case* predicate clauses...) behaves like CASE, but uses PREDICATE for its
> equality test.

ISLisp has this under the name of CASE-USING.

-- 
John Cowan  <cowan@x>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
                --Albert Einstein

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Next by Date: Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread