[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
- To: <xacc.ide@x>, "John Cowan" <cowan@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
- From: <xacc.ide@x>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:57:05 +0200
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- Importance: Normal
What I am trying to say is that there is not much point (at this stage)
trying to define standard interfaces for libraries that can be implemented
portably. Users can and will define this.
It is the ones that cannot be implemented portably that should follow a
standard interface. Only the implementer can deal with that.
> Perhaps standard interfaces and *behavior* should be defined as Scheme
> will be stuck in toy land forever...
Scheme-reports mailing list