[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
- To: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
- From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 11:04:52 +0200
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
- In-reply-to: <m3aaehzu74.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
- References: <m38vu262p6.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <op.vvrej8vo0p3ku8@localhost> <m3aaehzu74.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
Hallo,
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I am mildly in favor, though the concision of "blob-length" over
> "bytevector-length" is a point in blob's favor.
>
True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
not BLOB.
Cheers,
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports