Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language

[Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> Thanks for your patience bearing with me learning about how this
>> is all going.
> 
> Sure.  I'll probably boil this thread down into a wiki page at some
> point.
> 

I am also interested in proposing additions to R7RS-large and am
confused about the process.

The pages on trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ had led me to believe that the first
step in proposing something was to post to
scheme-reports-wg2@x and that substantive technical
discussion would happen there. But after reading this thread, my
present understanding is that the first step is to write up a SRFI
proposal and submit it to srfi-editors@x If and when
the SRFI is granted "final" status, someone can propose to
scheme-reports-wg2@x that the SRFI be included in
R7RS-large. Is that correct?

Thanks,
Kevin Wortman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR21IQAAoJEOR0TeLqHWMJfS8H/iWQV3nYhIzCUyTJYxTX0nAU
HoANnyKY7ABtZPhBhZloRljM/pDjGYc6BTOqW5tsVOSXvnAzJM4qrzrytyVIbdJm
+OBoGoFzGWmP/Eq4drLkzRYPbWIYARvPQEyvtMpYOIrILSP/P7PLy7Bc1ezmVsGb
NAhpBfpT3Rt7IW2hWKqKFh9TtEgHbgp0EMVyL4oZffRfJqiNpc9FQi+4rDP8IKa/
8hoyY0FK6bhSM+F7IICLJ1Kl8G5ZXpm3ryya1tCJsFoOZb4yz/fvTkqll3m/hfY2
7VcCyIdqLCFmvKprnDq6xE8wXEcjj8y7c7BdvRP5TLXuheXoIhaFGGJ/+RDaeuw=
=B5+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports