Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> The only significant change was the reversal to the R5RS semantics for
> eq? and eqv?, as discussed earlier on this list.  Any further changes
> will be collected in a separate errata document.

To clarify, we did revert to the R5RS semantics for `eqv?`, but not
quite for `eq?`.  In R5RS, `eq?` and `eqv?` are required to return the
same thing at all times; in R7RS, we only say that `eq?` must return #t
if the procedures' location tags are equal.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: cowan@x]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports