Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x> wrote:

You maybe made some misreading (or I misread your mail). I'm just
talking about <pattern datum>, but not <pattern>. If <bytevector> is a
<simple datum> as you said should it be added to the list just like below?

<pattern datum> -> <string>
  | <character>
  | <boolean>
  | <number>
  | <bytevector>   # <- me!

Indeed, sorry, I thought you wanted to be able to

destructure bytevectors in patterns.

Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports