[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> Well, the change list would have been much smaller comparing to R7RS-large.
Eh, maybe, maybe not. It would have been more fine-grained.
> If we're going to keep it, it's probably best to remove the comments and
I have done so now, squeezing the R6RS list down to bare bones, less
than a page. In particular, the main and library documents are no longer
separated, since most of what there is to say about the library document
is "We didn't do it". I also (in a separate changeset) squeezed the
R5RS list so as to save a complete page.
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
In computer science, we stand on each other's feet.
--Brian K. Reid
Scheme-reports mailing list