Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"

[Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>]

On 05/22/11 22:53, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> But if WG1-voted decisions are written in stone as you say, then it makes little
> sense for this discussion group to even continue.  What was the point then of
> making the draft public?  I will henceforth stop my "moaning"/participation
> here.  I wish you good luck.

No! Don't do that!

By all means vent frustration by shouting at each other, but don't let
that get in the way of working together to make Scheme great.

Fatalism and anger will only lead to R7RS just being another R6RS -
swinging too far to the other extreme, driven by rage and bile.

If I were more awesome, I would quote a relevant passage from the Tao Te
Ching here.

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports