[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Per Bothner scripsit:
> In Kawa set! returns no values. I think this makes the REPL nicer:
> set!, define, and similar forms return no values, which prints out as
Every R5RS-compliant Scheme I know of does effectively the same thing:
it returns a distinguished value which the P part of the REPL ignores.
There was a discussion of standardizing this value, but the the WG
decided not to.
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
Scheme-reports mailing list