[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
- To: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
- From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:11:43 -0500
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- In-reply-to: <CABpjPcLkFQXQQ=v_pm=QEQtaMPvYwKpNA6+qh9kj0HBmsBz_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20110816103609.GJ2309@frohike.homeunix.org> <20110816.125430.55502248.felix@call-with-current-continuation.org> <CABpjPcLkFQXQQ=v_pm=QEQtaMPvYwKpNA6+qh9kj0HBmsBz_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Felix <felix@x>
> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
> To: Peter.Bex@x
> Cc: denisw@x, asandroq@x
>
> Alex Shinn did a poll on the "scheme-implementors" mailing list
> recently (a non-public mailing list hosted by google groups)
>From what I read there was a lot of outrage against the private
mailing lists that effected the R6RS standard.
Are there private mailing lists that effect the standard new standard
as well? :(
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports