[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
- From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:43:44 -0600 (CST)
Both read-error? and file-error? are currently part of (scheme base). Since both the read procedure and file procedures are in separate libraries and are optional, it does not make sense to make these 2 procedures required. I propose that read-error? be part of the (scheme read) library, and that file-error? be part of the (scheme file) library.
Arthur
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports