Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?

[Andy Wingo <wingo@x>]

On Wed 27 Apr 2011 08:56, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x> writes:

> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:14:33 -0400, Andre van Tonder <andre@x>  
> wrote:
>
>> In otehr words, definitions introduced in macros can possibly shadow  
>> toplevel
>> bindings, which is a major obstacle to safe hygienic macro programming.
>
> More than a major obstacle, I would argue that this violates hygiene and  
> should not be allowed in Scheme's hygienic macros.

I would still appreciate pointers as to how to implement this ;-) Anyone
can implement Scheme, but only half a dozen people have implemented
separate compilation with hygienically introduced toplevel bindings.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports