Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@x> wrote:

Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes:
> This was revisited in item #286 in the 5th ballot, and
> we voted to revert the previous decision.

The results of #286 do not convince me that the working group changed
their minds about item #117.  #117 was a highly-focused ballot item on
this precise issue, whereas #286 was mostly about whether to add another
set of predicates.

We discussed exactly these points and made clear to the

members that #286 was allowed to overturn #117.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports