Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <scheme@x> wrote:

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote:

 

However, I do stand by the notion that past WG ballots

and intentions are superseded by later discussion.

This was a community effort with a community ratification,

and the most recent and specific discussion on the issue

was in reference to the formal syntax, so I think that should

take precedence.

That seems reasonable.

 

If the other two editors disagree you can add it to

the errata.

Shouldn't it be in the errata in any case since there is a contradiction?  The question is not whether this issue should appear in the errata, but what conclusion should appear.

Yes.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports