Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"

[Andre van Tonder <andre@x>]

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Cowan wrote:

> It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.

Why is INCLUDE conflated with the module language?  It is really an orthogonal 
concept.  INCLUDE as defined in Chez (e.g.) is just a form (definable as a 
procedural macro) that can be used in any code, including R6RS libraries.

So we don't need the R7RS proposed syntax for INCLUDE.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports