[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Cowan wrote:
> It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.
Why is INCLUDE conflated with the module language? It is really an orthogonal
concept. INCLUDE as defined in Chez (e.g.) is just a form (definable as a
procedural macro) that can be used in any code, including R6RS libraries.
So we don't need the R7RS proposed syntax for INCLUDE.
Scheme-reports mailing list