[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder scripsit:
> You don't really gain much since you would still need to say something like
> (import (except (rnrs) + - * - /)
Yes, that's what I mean by a single point of messiness. But the alternative
is to use prefixed names at *every* point of call, without even the option
of changing or shortening the prefix. IMHO that is a worse mess.
> I have already discussed the problem with automatic overriding of imports
> in a prior message.
Yes, I accept that argument now.
That you can cover for the plentiful John Cowan
and often gaping errors, misconstruals, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and disinformation in your posts cowan@x
through sheer volume --that is another
misconception. --Mike to Peter
Scheme-reports mailing list