Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli@x> wrote:

10 minutes ago, Alex Shinn wrote:
>
> I've started to list some examples of sexp-based
> pure data languages at:
>
>   http://community.schemewiki.org/?sexp-language
>
> None of these examples are macros (although some
> provide convenience syntax wrappers).

I'm assuming that you don't really want a criticism of that page
(which has parts that range from misleading to near-bogosities)...

Please feel free to edit it.  That's the whole point - there's

no need to criticize what you can fix yourself.

I just worked a 12 hour day plus 2 hours commute and

scribbled down the first examples that came to mind.

I need to sleep now so I can repeat tomorrow.  I might

have time to provide examples on the weekend for people

who don't have time to read the references.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports