[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
- To: johnthescavenger@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:06:14 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #382:
Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
The editors rejected this request as too late and unlikely to survive
a ballot. It is trivial to redefine `if` to work this way.
If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Response, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.
--
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
It's the old, old story. Droid meets droid. Droid becomes chameleon.
Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back
again. It's a classic tale. --Kryten, Red Dwarf
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports