Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Eli Barzilay scripsit:

> > R6RS provided a module system
> 
> Still does.

By "R6RS" I mean the process, not the product.

> There are some implementations that provide module systems and a
> (deterministic) repl.  

Can you elaborate on this?  Obviously, it's possible to have *some*
sort of REPL, such as the one discussed some months ago in which typing
#!r6rs throws away the world and implicitly starts over with an empty
top-level program.  But that's nothing like a Scheme REPL as we know it.

-- 
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax."                  John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?"  cowan@x
  --"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports