[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] TELUS Detected SpamRe: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching

To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:36:08 +0900
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <AANLkTin5CsMuX=nmd_M2qA0NVnGa=v7EEhX_=6AcWmo6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D07A7E9.2070601@bothner.com> <87hbe7yvtz.fsf@gondolin.draga.com> <1292949716.2277.7.camel@io> <87oc8fxd07.fsf@gondolin.draga.com> <1292962352.2277.35.camel@io> <20101221203028.GD25830@mercury.ccil.org> <1292969081.2277.54.camel@io> <20101221225457.GG25830@mercury.ccil.org> <1292188488.3696.27.camel@io> <19730.1898.352834.459459@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> <20101222165533.GA19901@mercury.ccil.org> <AANLkTikR0uFyhe12OdU=FAz1cd8sstMDNVHjhyGB6sVn@mail.gmail.com> <1293050092.2356.33.camel@io> <AANLkTindWovo+EMo_kVL3MSkur3kv4V5tm7CO7djJEJk@mail.gmail.com> <1293054424.2356.58.camel@io> <AANLkTinuq6khMFE1FBcdxUCmi3fcQJaq+22zymjF_SOs@mail.gmail.com> <1293098544.2356.167.camel@io> <AANLkTinWZ4uvNhgdt5BESvgXnET-PPidQTipSm1E0Uiu@mail.gmail.com> <201012232034.oBNKYctD011701@abbenay.cs.berkeley.edu> <5E425CC4-ECCD-4986-B699-6ACBE9072194@telus.net> <AANLkTi=_sTZ_my6XXqjTrSrmLxm8X4BS2k_dimwR55vQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin5CsMuX=nmd_M2qA0NVnGa=v7EEhX_=6AcWmo6@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@x> wrote:
>
> Insanity. If it will be a portable library that places no burden on
> implementors, then it doesn't even need to be in the standard.

This is for WG2, the "large" standard.  The whole point of WG2
is to provide standard libraries.  If you don't think libraries matter,
free to ignore the WG2 effort and only concern yourself with WG1.

> How do you think it will genuinely place no burden on implementors?

Because they can just use the reference implementation.

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>

References:
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  - From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching

Re: [Scheme-reports] TELUS Detected SpamRe: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching